Widakuswara v. Lake
Coalition sues to return employees to work
The lawsuit has led to major victories for the plaintiffs, including a March 2026 ruling that called for VOA's broadcasts to be restored.
Widakuswara v. Lake plaintiffs Jessica Jerreat, Patsy Widakuswara and Kate Neeper.
March 21, 2025 • Filed one week after President Donald Trump signed his March 14, 2025, executive order that began dismantling VOA, Widakuswara v. Lake has led to major court victories for the plaintiffs. Following the first hearing of the case at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Paul Oetken granted a temporary restraining order order that prohibited USAGM from immediately carrying out its planned layoffs, including for about 600 contractors.
After the case was moved to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in April 2025, District Judge Royce Lamberth issued a preliminary injunction that ordered USAGM to restore VOA programming to fulfill a statutory mandate that VOA “serve as a reliable and authoritative source of news.” To uphold this injunction, Lamberth paused mass layoffs at VOA and USAGM set to take effect in September 2025.
After nearly a year of litigation, Lamberth issued a pair of momentous orders in March 2026. In the first, he ruled that Kari Lake was not lawfully appointed to lead USAGM and voided all her actions. In the second, he said Lake’s attempt to bring VOA and USAGM to the “statutory minimum” was unlawful and ordered employees on administrative leave be returned to work.
Named plaintiffs of Widakuswara v. Lake recap what the saveVOA campaign achieved in 2025.
Recent statements from the plaintiffs
Plaintiffs eager to rebuild VOA following judge’s return-to-work order
March 17, 2026
This is a monumental decision, and we are deeply grateful. We are eager to begin repairing the damage Kari Lake has inflicted on our agency and our colleagues, to return to our congressional mandate, and to rebuild the trust of the global audience we have been unable to serve for the past year. We know the road to restoring VOA’s operations and reputation will be long and difficult. We hope the American people will continue to support our mission to produce journalism, not propaganda.
— Patsy Widakuswara, Jessica Jerreat and Kate Neeper
Plaintiffs welcome USAGM providing court with succession plan
March 12, 2026
We’re glad to see that the government has provided the court with information regarding USAGM leadership, and eager to see their plans for the agency’s congressionally-appropriated funds. Our objectives remain the same: to restore VOA’s global presence, and to ensure it continues to provide accurate, objective, and comprehensive news, as required by law.
— Patsy Widakuswara, Jessica Jerreat and Kate Neeper
Plaintiffs call ruling a 'powerful step' to undo 'damage' inflicted by Kari Lake
March 7, 2026
We feel vindicated and deeply grateful. The judge’s ruling that Kari Lake’s actions shall have no force or effect is a powerful step toward undoing the damage she has inflicted on this American institution that we love. Even as we work through what this ruling means for colleagues harmed by her actions, it brings renewed hope and momentum to the next phase of our fight: restoring VOA’s global operations and ensuring we continue to produce journalism, not propaganda.
— Patsy Widakuswara, Jessica Jerreat and Kate Neeper
Plaintiffs give an update on their lawsuit to restore VOA journalism
February 12, 2026
After Congress passed a bill in February funding VOA and President Donald Trump signed it into law, the plaintiffs in Widakuswara v. Lake urged for the full restoration of VOA’s global broadcasts and for the independence of its journalism.
“We’re grateful that lawmakers want to continue to fund VOA. We hope that money is used to fully restore VOA operations and ensure that we return to our independent journalism because if we model VOA after state media such as Russia Today and China Global Television Network, we would lose our audience,” said Patsy Widakuswara and Jessica Jerreat.
The plaintiffs said that their lawsuit has always been not just about saving VOA jobs, but also about saving its journalism.
“We have lost most, if not all, of our audience. And even more alarming, much of VOA’s current content reflects primarily the administration’s point of view. That is not our mandate,” they said.
On February 12, lawyers for the plaintiffs responded to federal Judge Royce Lamberth’s request for information on the significance of the Congressional appropriation of funding for USAGM and VOA. In a filing, they argued “Congress’s decision to once again appropriate hundreds of millions of dollars to USAGM and VOA confirms what Plaintiffs have been saying all along: restoring USAGM’s and VOA’s operation to its status before Defendants took their illegal action is imperative and legally required.”
“We are eager to begin repairing the damage Kari Lake has inflicted on our agency and our colleagues, to return to our congressional mandate, and to rebuild the trust of the global audience we have been unable to serve for the past year.”
— Plaintiffs Patsy Widakuswara, Jessica Jerreat and Kate Neeper

Judge restores Voice of America jobs after Trump admin cuts